Your AI agent follows instructions. Composure enforces them.
Architecture enforcement, security scanning, and code intelligence — automated in real-time, not based on what AI was trained on.
One install replaces ~$338/mo of separate tooling.
What makes Composure different
Hooks, not suggestions
17 enforcement hooks across 8 languages. Your AI agent literally cannot bypass them. Instructions are suggestions — hooks are enforcement.
Code graph, not exploration
AST-parsed knowledge graph with 13 MCP tools. Query callers, blast radius, and dependencies in milliseconds — no agent spawning needed.
Commit gating, not hoping
Every commit checks for open Critical/High items on staged files. Security findings, decomposition violations, CVEs — nothing ships with known issues.
Full lifecycle, not single-purpose
Init → blueprint → build → review → scan → test → deploy → commit. One suite covers what 7+ separate tools charge $338/month for.
See it in action
A delta review that uses the code graph to find blast radius, map callers, and detect untested changes — in seconds, not minutes.
/composure:critique→ Changes: src/lib/auth.ts, src/hooks/useAuth.ts→ Impact: 3 files direct, 7 files indirect→ Risk: Medium (auth module, 12 callers)→ Untested: handleLogin() — 12 callers, 0 tests→ Suggestion: Add tests before mergingTotal: 3 graph queries, <5 seconds(vs 3 Explore agents, ~9,000 words, 45+ seconds)The cockpit behind every decision.
The Control Panel puts the code graph, live sessions, and commit gates on one screen. Query callers, map blast radius, and see which files a change touches — in milliseconds, not minutes. Nothing ships until Critical and High items on staged files are cleared.
▸aurora-crmSee it in action.
Three capabilities that change how reviews, security, and impact analysis work when enforcement is deterministic — not advisory.
Code graph. Not token windows.
Before any file lands, Composure queries the AST-parsed code graph for blast radius and caller chains — 3 queries in under 5 seconds. Compare: 3 Explore agents, ~9,000 words, 45+ seconds.
How the graph works →Deterministic security — not AI guesses.
Sentinel runs Semgrep rules and a secrets sweep on every commit. Missing RLS policies, NEXT_PUBLIC_ service-role keys, and OWASP Top-10 patterns are flagged the moment the code is written — not at review time.
See the security rules →Reviews tied to the commit gate.
/composure:critique maps untested entry points, scores risk by caller count, and surfaces exact blast-radius numbers. Critical and High findings on staged files block the merge — they don't just warn.
See how reviews work →The Composure Suite
6 plugins. 59 skills. One install.
How we compare
Across every category, the same pattern: rivals cover a slice, Composure covers the stack — and ties it together.
| Composure | CodeRabbit | Snyk | Codacy | SonarQube | Greptile | Qodo | DeepSource | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent memory graph | ||||||||
| Code graph + blast radius | ||||||||
| Graph ↔ memory fusion | ||||||||
| AI code review | ||||||||
| SAST / security scan | ||||||||
| Test generation | ||||||||
| CI/CD generation | ||||||||
| Architecture guidance | ||||||||
| Hook enforcement (blocks) | ||||||||
| Live Control Panel |
Comparable annual price (Composure $348/dev vs $216–$708) — and the only one that fills every column. The dedicated reviewers and scanners each cover a slice; none ship a persistent code-graph + blast radius wired into memory.
Capabilities & pricing from each tool's official docs, June 2026. Filled = core, dash = partial, ✕ = none.
These catches are real — see the enforcement records →
View all features →