35%
cost reduction, zero context lost
Plan on Opus, build on Sonnet, review on Opus
The memory graph carries the same context across models — architect with the strongest one, implement with a cheaper one, review with the strongest again, without re-explaining the project once.
Different models are good at different jobs: the strongest one for architecture and review, a cheaper one for the volume of implementation. The catch is usually context — switching models means re-explaining the project and losing decisions.
Composure's memory graph carries the same context across the handoffs, so Opus plans, Sonnet builds, and Opus reviews on one continuous thread. The expensive model only runs where its judgment matters — 35% cheaper, with nothing lost in translation.
- Memory graph carries context across model switches
- Strong model for judgment, cheap model for volume
- 35% cheaper with zero context loss
This is what Pro delivers.
Not features for their own sake — measurable leverage on every session.